Exploring distance learning in higher education: satisfaction and insights from Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Romania, Turkey
Abstract
Education, notably higher education, faced a significant challenge during the last period. Our data exploratory study aims to provide insights into the key factors that define students’ Distance Learning (DL) in the current period. Based on the main findings, we justify our bold proposition for the current era of distance and blended learning in Higher Education. Our research study aims to understand cultural and national differences in four countries: Mexico, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Romania. It contributes to the theory of DL with a model of six hermeneutic factors for the satisfaction of using the DL method. It investigated and confirmed the capacity of the components to explain 60% of the DL satisfaction variance. Our research study also emphasized the interpretation of the essential findings and the drafting of bold propositions for the DL practice, emphasising academic environments. We identified significant areas of improvement, and we suggested the orchestration of combined efforts. Our research promotes the strategic deployment of DL in the current context as a resilient strategy of institutions for high-impact training and targeting of huge audiences, with emphasis on the deployment of new tools and teaching methods customized for a new, unique value proposition of the DL.
Keyword : distance learning, technology, satisfaction, principal component analysis, COVID-19, higher education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
Al-Qahtani, A. A. Y., & Higgins, S. E. (2013). Effects of traditional, blended and e-learning on students’ achievement in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00490.x
Amemado, D., & Manca, S. (2017). Learning from decades of online distance education: MOOCs and the Community of Inquiry framework. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/137
Ashri, D., Sahoo, B. P., & Kaur, S. (2020). Digitalization of traditional classrooms: A students’ perspective, International Journal of Educational Sciences, 31(1–3), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2020/31.1-3.1160
Bakia, M., Shear, L., Toyama, Y., & Lasseter, A. (2012). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. Office of Educational Technology, US Department of Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532492.pdf
Bartolic, S., Matzat, U., Tai, J., Burgess, J. L., Boud, D., Craig, H., Archibald, A., De Jaeger, A., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Lutze-Mann, L., Polly, P., Roth, M., Heap, T., Agapito, J., & Guppy, N. (2022). Student vulnerabilities and confidence in learning in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies in Higher Education, 47(12), 2460–2472. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2081679
Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, Article 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424
Benabbes, K., Housni, K., Hmedna, B., Zellou, A., & Mezouary, A. E. (2023). Explore the influence of contextual characteristics on the learning understanding of LMS. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 16823–16861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11899-y
Benson, A. D. (2002). Using online learning to meet workforce demand: A case study of stakeholder influence. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 443–452. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95258/
Blundell, R., Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020). COVID‐19 and inequalities. Fiscal Studies, 41(2), 291–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12232
Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1467–1489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22318
Bolliger, D. U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-learning, 3(1), 61–67. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/2226/.
Boltsi, A., Kalovrektis, K., Xenakis, A., Chatzimisios, P., & Chaikalis, C. (2024). Digital tools, technologies and learning methodologies for education 4.0 frameworks: A STEM oriented survey. IEEE Access, 12, 12883–12901. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3355282
Borrella, I., Caballero-Caballero, S., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2022). Taking action to reduce dropout in MOOCs: Tested interventions. Computers & Education, 179, Article 104412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104412
Brown, J. C., & Park, H. S. (2016). Longitudinal student research competency: comparing online and traditional face-to-face learning platforms. Advances in Social Work, 17(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.18060/20870
Burns, R. (2020). A COVID-19 panacea in digital technologies? Challenges for democracy and higher education. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620930832
Clark, R. (2002). Six principles of effective e-Learning: What works and why. The e-learning Developer’s Journal, 6(2), 1–10. https://www.learningguild.com/pdf/2/091002des-h.pdf
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Council Recommendation on blended learning for high quality and inclusive primary and secondary education. Brussels, 5.8.2021 COM(2021) 455 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0455&from=EN
Conrad, D. (2002). Deep in the hearts of learners: Insights into the nature of online community. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/133
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y
Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649609526919
Dede, C., & Lewis, M. (1995). Assessment of emerging educational technologies that might assist and enhance school-to-work transitions. National Technical Information Service, Washington, DC. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=51f6d2685f34b715a7c512a9dc578b0db86c76ba
Drosos, D., Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Ntanos, S., & Parissi, A. (2021). School managers perceptions towards energy efficiency and renewable energy sources. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 10(3), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2021.36704
García-Peñalvo, F. J., Corell, A., Abella-García, V., & Grande, M. (2020). Online assessment in higher education in the time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.23086
Georgakopoulos, I., Piromalis, D., Ntanos, S., Zakopoulos, V., Makrygiannis, P. (2023). A prediction model for remote lab courses designed upon the principles of education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 15, Article 5473. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065473
Hameed, F., Qayyum, A., & Khan, F. A. (2024). A new trend of learning and teaching: Behavioral intention towards mobile learning. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00252-w
Harlow, R. M. (2024). Using hybrid workshops to integrate online and in-person learning in a public-speaking course. Communication Teacher, 38(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2023.2275580
Iivari, N., Sharma, S., & Ventä-Olkkonen, L. (2020). Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?. International Journal of Information Management, 55, Article 102183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183
Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). US faculty and administrators’ experiences and approaches in the early weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
King, F. B., Young, M. F., Drivere-Richmond, K., & Schrader, P. G. (2001). Defining distance learning and distance education. AACE Review (Formerly AACE Journal), 9(1), 1–14. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/17786/.
Klaus, T., & Changchit, C. (2014). Environmental factors of distance learning: An exploratory study. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 10(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014010102
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2021). Globalized inclination to acquire knowledge and skills toward economic development. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 18, 1349–1369. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.125
Kyriakopoulos, G. L., Ntanos, S., & Asonitou, S. (2020). Investigating the environmental behavior of business and accounting university students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(4), 819–839. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-11-2019-0338
Lam, Y. Y. (2010). Impact of globalization on higher education: An empirical study of education policy & planning of design education in Hong Kong. International Education Studies, 3(4), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n4p73
Liu, P., Wang, X., Teng, F., Li, Y., & Wang, F. (2022). Distance education quality evaluation based on multigranularity probabilistic linguistic term sets and disappointment theory. Information Sciences, 605, 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.034
Lowenthal, P. R., Wilson, B., & Parrish, P. (2009, October). Context matters: A description and typology of the online learning landscape. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 32nd Annual proceedings: Selected research and development papers presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. Louisville, KY. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228632390_Context_matters_A_description_and_typology_of_the_online_learning_landscape
Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W. C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 19(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
Masalimova, A. R., Khvatova, M. A., Chikileva, L. S., Zvyagintseva, E. P., Stepanova, V. V., & Melnik, M. V. (2022). Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 822958. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958
Mittelmeier, J., & Yang, Y. (2022). The role of internationalisation in 40 years of higher education research: Major themes from Higher Education Research & Development (1982–2020). Higher Education Research & Development, 41(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002272
Moore, M. G. (1990). Contemporary issues in American distance education. Pergamon Press.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Motiwalla, L., & Tello, S. (2000). Distance learning on the internet: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(4), 253–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00026-9
Mravik, M., Sarac, M., Bacanin, N., & Adamovic, S. (2023). Distance learning in difficult conditions due to the pandemic state of emergency. Journal of Internet Technology, 24(3), 631–640. https://jit.ndhu.edu.tw/article/view/2901
Murphy, M. P. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1–10.
OECD. (2020). Education Responses to Covid-19: Implementing a Way Forward (OECD Working Paper No. 224). https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP(2020)12&docLanguage=En
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69–77.
Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2293431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431
Rahimi, R. A., & Oh, G. S. (2024). Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: Navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12, 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00303-4
Qiao, P., Zhu, X., Guo, Y., Sun, Y., & Qin, C. (2021). The development and adoption of online learning in pre-and post-COVID-19: Combination of technological system evolution theory and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), Article 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040162
Sahin, A., Imamoglu, G., Murat, M., & Ayyildiz, E. (2024). A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 92, Article 101812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101812
Salas‐Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Sato, S. N., Condes Moreno, E., Rubio-Zarapuz, A., Dalamitros, A. A., Yañez-Sepulveda, R., Tornero-Aguilera, J. F., & Clemente-Suárez, V. J. (2023). Navigating the new normal: Adapting online and distance learning in the post-pandemic era. Education Sciences, 14(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010019
Segbenya, M., Bervell, B., Minadzi, V. M., & Somuah, B. A. (2022). Modelling the perspectives of distance education students towards online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00193-y
Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021). Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Tolmachev, M., Korotaeva, I., Zharov, A., & Beloglazova, L. (2022). Development of students’ digital competence when using the “Oracle” electronic portal. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(4), 1261–1270. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.4.1261
Tseng, H. (2020). An exploratory study of students’ perceptions of learning management system utilisation and learning community. Research in Learning Technology, 28. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2423
Turan, Z., Kucuk, S., & Cilligol Karabey, S. (2022). The university students’ self-regulated effort, flexibility and satisfaction in distance education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00342-w
UNICEF Regional Office for South Asia. (2020). Guidance on distance learning modalities to reach all children and youth during school closures. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Regional Office for South Asia, Kathmandu, Nepal. https://www.unicef.org/rosa/media/7996/file/Guidance%20Continuity%20of%20Learning%20during%20COVID
Van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers & Education, 50(3), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001
Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540010344731
Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641
Xiao, J., Sun‐Lin, H. Z., Lin, T. H., Li, M., Pan, Z., & Cheng, H. C. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for hybrid learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in hybrid learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
Zheng, Y., & Xiao, A. (2024). A structural equation model of online learning: investigating self-efficacy, informal digital learning, self-regulated learning, and course satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1276266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1276266
Zou, D., Huang, X., Kohnke, L., Chen, X., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the trends and research topics of empirical research on TPACK. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 10585–10609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10991-z